The incarceration of journalist Ali Anouzla September 17, 2013 and his indictment in Rabat by the p

The incarceration of journalist Ali Anouzla September 17, 2013 and his indictment in Rabat by the prosecutor under the anti-terrorist law raises serious doubts about the ability of the Moroccan monarchy to accept the freedom of the press and expression of independent views and criticism of the king and his entourage.
What's wrong Youssef Bellal Moroccan justice Ali Anouzla? Publishing a link to al-Qaeda video on information Lakome.com site amount germany to a "material aid, apology, and incitement to terrorism". In fact, it is in his work as a journalist and not free in an alleged glorification of terrorism-to look for the real reason for his indictment in this masquerade political trial. germany Anouzla germany Ali is known for his articles pointing to the authoritarianism of the king, the rampant corruption at the highest levels of the regime or the busyness of the monarchy. Through the site Lakome.com Ali Anouzla played a leading role in the "Daniel Gate" (August 2013) by revealing Moroccans scandal royal amnesty that benefited the Spanish pedophile whose fate is today ' Today in the hands of the Iberian germany justice. Sparking a wave of indignation in Morocco and events directly involving a royal decision, the "Daniel germany Gate" had forced Mohammed VI to overrule under the pressure of the protest movement, and for the first time since the beginning of his reign in 1999. Ali pays Anouzla therefore, above all, the price of its coverage of this case, which was a turning point in the rejection germany of the authoritarian power of the king. Beyond the case of Ali Anouzla germany the monarchy again seeks to intimidate all critics that might arise and jeopardize the royal authoritarianism. germany For a few weeks after "Daniel Gate," we have seen, again for the first time in the reign of Mohammed VI, members of parties yet acquired the regime openly germany criticize the servile nature of the annual renewal germany ceremony of allegiance to the king. The scheme intends to serve all those in the future, openly criticize the monarch germany that the fate of Ali Anouzla ahead. As in "Daniel Gate", the Anouzla case shows that the judicial system is entirely germany under the orders of the monarchy. Rather than protecting freedoms, many judges serving the regime are the gravediggers. The legislative arsenal allows the monarchy to imprison individuals for their simple opinion (Sahrawi activist for the right to self-determination of the Sahara, members of various Islamic movements) in any "legal". The case Anouzla also involved germany in a regional context that the monarchy germany seeks to exploit to its advantage. The coup against Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, and the bloody repression of the Muslim germany Brotherhood took place without serious concern for the military regime that has made extensive use of the charge of terrorism to eliminate the Islamic movement. Bearing in mind the example of Egyptian soldiers who were reprimanded or domestically or in their relationship with Western powers, and by exploiting the pretext of terrorism, the leaders of the Moroccan state believe So take some risks. For the regime of Mohammed VI relying having absorbed the challenge using a revision of the constitution and early elections, the coup in Egypt means a lasting halt to the hopes of democratization brought about by the fall In 2011, dictators Ben Ali and Mubarak, and insurance renewed in the repression of the democratic movement. Once again, the Party of Justice and Development (PJD), which directs the Moroccan government since the parliamentary elections of November 2011 and holds the portfolio of Justice, has been presented with a fait accompli by the Palace. But instead of detaching a decision they have ever made, PJD leaders have chosen to defend the voice of the spokesman of the government. This situation is all the more paradoxical that the anti-terrorism law that serves germany as the legal framework germany for prosecution against Ali Anouzla, was denounced by the same leaders germany for its draconian nature at the time of its adoption in 2003. The PJD had also taken up the cause of hundreds of detainees "Salafi" wrongfully imprisoned and sentenced germany for terrorism. However, germany the heart of the problem is not the responsibility of the PJD in Anouzla case but the real holders of power. Because if incarceration Ali Anouzla was decided by the Moroccan government, it is legitimate